Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 29,602
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (2002), City of Monterey v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:26 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
The parties entered into a Parenting Plan and Settlement Agreement which was adopted by a South Africa High Court. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 10:00 am
Supreme Court's decision in Connelly v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 11:56 am
It sued LPS under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and state anti-hacking law. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 2:57 am
Welsh v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 4:37 pm
United States District Court Judge Ronald M. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 6:47 am
After a Danish ship, the M/V CEC Future, was captured by Somali pirates in late 2008, Ali boarded the ship and translated the pirates’ demands to the ship owners. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:29 pm
EPA's approval of the 2004 State Implementation Plan (2004 SIP) for the San Joaquin Valley's nonattainment area for the one-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:26 am
About the only thing that seems clear after the argument in Gobeille v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
No central economic planning is in place. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
Opponents of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
In Lieberman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:31 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 6:02 am
Such a lawsuit could concede that notwithstanding the Supreme Court's invalidation of the Line Item Veto Act in Clinton v. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 10:01 pm
The Supreme Court took up the case of whether the city violated the Fifth Amendment’s takings clause in Kelo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 11:38 am
-John The post Hourly v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:57 am
In FDA v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:21 pm
"Additionally, "Sharkey's proposal does not correct the deficient error-cost analysis in the Kessler-Vladeck plan. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Independent Living Center); and those requiring compliance with antidiscrimination and other federal civil rights norms.When it enacted Medicaid, Congress expressly reserved the “right to alter, amend, or repeal any provision” of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 1304—and therefore each State Medicaid plan expressly provides that its plan “will be amended whenever necessary to reflect . . . [read post]
