Search for: "Thomas View" Results 2841 - 2860 of 12,083
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 9:00 am by Robert Brammer
Bentham’s views on the United States independence later softened, though he continued to reject the claim of natural rights that underpin the Declaration. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 7:33 am by Dawn N. Williams
  Chief Justice Roberts delivered the opinion, with Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh joining in Parts I, II, and III, and Justices Alito and Kavanaugh joining in Part IV. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Josh Blackman
The Court Calls for the Views of the Solicitor General in Texas v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 7:00 pm
And even though that behavior is reprehensible, we do not support removing a statute of Thomas Jefferson. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:49 am by Grant Sullivan
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch each penned concurring opinions expressing varying levels of disagreement with the court’s free exercise jurisprudence, while Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor authored dissents. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:13 am by John Knepper
In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas points out that, just two months ago, in Ramos v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
“In my view, California’s discrimination against religious worship services contravenes the Constitution,” Justice Gorsuch wrote. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm by Josh Blackman
" That simple descriptor reveals the glacial pace with which Roberts views the law. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Court’s opinion rested on its view that the law provided no benefits to women’s health and that the law substantially burdened women’s access to abortion because the requirements forced the closing of a significant number of the state’s abortion clinics.There’s a genius to TRAP laws—they sound reasonable until more facts are on the table. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Howard Friedman
It overlooks one after another....Justice Kavanaugh filed a dissent, saying in part:[I]n my view, additional fact finding is necessary to properly evaluate Louisiana’s law. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Marcia Coyle
Kavanaugh and Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas said sexual orientation and gender identity were never on the table in 1964, and, in fact, some conduct by gays was considered criminal at the time. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
The justices then asked questions in the following sequence: Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh.Sometimes this format promoted continuity, other times it disrupted the flow of the argument. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
He has, himself, been to view the accommodation this morning and has personally helped to prepare this for new occupancy. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 7:15 am by Kari Hong
” Justice Clarence Thomas concurred “to address the original meaning of the Suspension Clause. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
J & J recited without comment or criticism what plaintiffs’ expert witnesses had testified, much of which was quite objectionable.[16] For instance, Moline and Felsher both reprised the scientifically and judicially debunked views that there is “no known safe level of exposure,” from which they inferred the non-sequitur that “any amount above ordinary background levels – could cause ovarian cancer. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
” The government relabeled the same status as “deferred action” in the late 1970s and has continued to view it as “an informal administrative stay of deportation … bestowed as a matter of prosecutorial grace. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 11:45 am by Paul Cassell
This conclusion is reinforced by the drafting history of Rule 48(a), recently summarized nicely in a short, on-line piece by Thomas Frampton. [read post]