Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 2841 - 2860 of 9,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2019, 10:43 am by Christopher Porter, Klara Jordan
Imagine the political response of an ally that is asked to burden-share in response to cyber aggression but is probably much closer to any resulting kinetic fight than the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:14 pm by John Collins
 The Court stated unequivocally that: “So far as we are aware, the expression “undue burden” has not entered the lexicon of Australian patent law with respect to s 40(2)(a) of the Act, which relevantly requires that the complete specification of a patent application describe the invention fully. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:39 pm by Patricia Salkin
  The United States filed an amicus brief in the Court of Appeals in the case, Jesus Christ is the Answer Ministries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
Meanwhile, after a separate altercation with another resident, the patient was sent for a psychiatric evaluation and moved to an all-male “lockdown” unit. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am by Michael Lowe
United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311, 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1948); Woodward v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
A law which confers a discretion is not in itself inconsistent with this requirement, provided the scope of the discretion and the manner of its exercise are indicated with sufficient clarity to give the individual protection against interference which is arbitrary: Goodwin v United Kingdom (1996) 22 EHRR 123 , para 31; Sorvisto v Finland , para 112. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm by Daniel Tokaji
Anderson prescribed a balancing test, under which the burdens on voting and association should be weighed against the state’s interest. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 8:03 am by Clifford A. Ulrich
On January 7, 2019, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued further guidance on patent subject matter eligibility, which should ease some of the burden placed on patent applicants seeking to obtain U.S. patents on certain technology, including blockchain technology. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:31 pm by Amy Howe
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced in January that it would review the case, Lamone v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:51 pm by Joel R. Brandes
’s habitual residence to the United States, regardless of his ability to enter the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Finally, the doctrinal reason for not having the military commission review these two additional violations is found in United States v. [read post]