Search for: "United States v. Texas" Results 2841 - 2860 of 8,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm by Florian Mueller
The states--led by the Beehive State--are (in alphabetical order): Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, D.C. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:54 am by Victoria VanBuren
by Jeremy Clare The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling confirming an arbitration award. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 3:50 pm by Mark Walsh
Demonstrators on each side of United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am by Florian Mueller
Ericsson evidentiary hearing (a trial by any other name) in the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) (Presiding Judge: Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Monica Bhattacharyya.Here are the minutes of the final trial day in Texas, which was rather short owing to the settlement:Ericsson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 8:59 am by Elly Page
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 9:39 am by Melissa De Witte
Evelyn Douek, Assistant Professor of Law(Originally published by Stanford News on October 7, 2022) On the docket for the United States Supreme Court this term is Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am by Robert Kreisman
  Voting in America is a precious right; eligibility is established in the United States Constitution, its amendments, by state laws and by various acts of Congress. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:02 am by Florian Mueller
On December 28, Chief Judge Rodnay Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted Ericsson an unprecedented--and in my view, outrageously overreaching--temporary restraining order (TRO) against Samsung's pursuit of a Chinese action intended to resolve a global FRAND rate dispute. [read post]
The United States District Court, Western District of Texas (the “District Court”), denied two motions to remand finding the allegations in the respective complaints was facially sufficient to establish an amount-in-controversy under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm by Victoria VanBuren
The Court noted, “Contrary to Armstrong’s apparent belief, pleadings filed in the United States District Courts are not press releases, internet blogs, or pieces of investigative journalism. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 12:23 pm by Steven Cohen
Landstar Ranger Inc – United States District Court – Northern District of Texas – September 27th, 2019) involves a car accident. [read post]