Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 14,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2012, 8:22 am
REGAN v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Farina then filed a petition pursuant to CPLR Article 78 seeking a court order annulling the hearing officer's determination and the restoration of the leave time he was charged while he was out of work due to the injuries he sustained.The Appellate Division noted that the standard of review of an administrative determination made after a hearing is limited to considering whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence and the test of whether the… [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:44 am
Additional Resources: Pornomo v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:29 pm
Translogic Tech. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 7:13 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Everclear Ltd (BVI) v Agrest & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 232 (09 March 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v Abdi [2011] EWCA Civ 242 (09 March 2011) Pitt & Anor v Holt & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 197 (09 March 2011) North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings, Inc & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 230 (09 March 2011) Bank of Scotland v Pereira & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 241 (09 March 2011) Nunn… [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
Local 5 v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:04 pm
It will be very hard for the Court to craft general standards about when administrative errors in law offices constitute cause for a procedural default. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:21 am
Standifer v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
On 7 March 2017, the Public Defender’s Office filed a request to establish the child’s residence in Paraguay, which was accepted by the Juvenile court under the argument that 11 years had passed since the return order was issued and that other rights had originated in the meantime. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:18 am
When Joel Ganzman, the Deputy Public Administrator of the Office of the Public Administrator of Kings County [Office] was named as a defendant in a Federal discrimination suit, [Gryga v Ganzman, Docket No. 97 Civ 3929, USDC, EDNY], he asked Michael D. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
Here's a quick guide to all of our posts analyzing the Court's decisions in Mass v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:03 am
The Court of Appeals says there is no case.The case is Basinski v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 1:56 pm
Superior Court (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004, 1026; Reynolds v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:41 am
The key Florida cases that discuss this are two Florida Supreme Court cases, Florida Bar v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The court said contrary to Petitioner's arguments, Employer appears "to have submitted the administrative record, including a certified transcript of the hearing," in its answer. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The court said contrary to Petitioner's arguments, Employer appears "to have submitted the administrative record, including a certified transcript of the hearing," in its answer. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 8:00 am
Dux v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:29 am
As an example of the positive side of the ledger for Judge Gorsuch, consider his aversion to retroactive application of administrative rules in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
