Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 7,433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2017, 12:06 pm
**As one footnote to Oullette's comments [e.g., I haven't carefully checked your sources (just as I don't carefully check the sources of articles I blog about, since this is a blog, not a law review)], one should note that Oullette has a Ph.D. in physics from Cornell and authored a paper -- Probing electrostatic potentials in solution with carbon nanotube transistors, L Larrimore, S Nad, X Zhou, H Abruna, PL McEuen - Nano letters, 2006 -- so one… [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
X in year one, Y in year two, etc. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:01 am
Fee Structure Hourly Rate is Effective So we fall back into the fee structure which I have never liked but it seems to be the only one that effectively works and that is between now and that point in time when I can give you an effective answer I’m going to charge you X dollars per hour. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
New York state court does not. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
Ralph I. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm
(In a separate essay, I assess the effect of the discount rate.) [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm
Section I: Purpose and Scope Importantly, the procedures start off with a description of what remains unaffected. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
In a case between Apple and Samsung, say, Justice X is invested in both parties. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:24 am
” The story does not, of course, begin with Jones, and it doesn’t end with him either. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:45 am
The opinion does not shed as much light on the facts of the case as I would like it to. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:45 am
The opinion does not shed as much light on the facts of the case as I would like it to. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:40 am
That brings us to… Copyright and Plagiarism in 2017 Usually this is where I saw something like “Year X is in the books but it gives us a look at what is ahead in X+1. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm
I suspect it does, but doesn’t that depend on what the SCC meant by “conclusions on fact and responsibility”? [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
X. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
X. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
And we also first heard in June about the re-hearing of a fact finding hearing in relation to a now adopted child, with a view to the parents attempting subsequently to challenge the adoption orders (Re X (A Child)). [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:00 am
The admissibility of the appealIn view of the facts set out at points I, V and VI above, the board finds that the appeal satisfies the admissibility criteria under the EPC and is thus admissible.2. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:10 pm
For example, the regulations provide this example: (i) In year 1, W, a foreign corporation, forms and contributes assets to X, a domestic limited liability company that does not elect to be treated as a corporation under §301.7701-3(c) of this chapter. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:08 am
Mandibular Fracture It is not unusual for car accidents to cause facial fractures. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:45 am
[I agree with the majority that this slices the transaction too finely. [read post]
