Search for: "Davis v. State" Results 2861 - 2880 of 6,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2010, 10:54 am by Lyle Denniston
Examining the Supreme Court’s most significant ruling on a claim of innocence based on new, post-trial evidence — Herrera v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm by Juan Antunez
Davis, 480 So.2d 625, 627 (Fla.1985); see also Webb, 899 So.2d at 346; Taylor Woodrow Homes Fla., Inc. v. 4/46-A Corp., 850 So.2d 536, 542 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Lopez-Infante v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One of the most extensive modern political-question discussions by the Supreme Court came in the 1993 Supreme Court ruling of Nixon v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit properly held that the alleged instructional error was harmful and that Davis v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on last week’s arguments in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff commenced this action against defendant for breach of contract, an account stated, quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (2020) EWCA Civ 542 The Court of Appeal have their way with the judicial review of the ‘Right to Rent’ scheme. [read post]
This post in our Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series discusses the Montana Supreme Court’s consideration of an insurer’s duty to defend in National Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 11:24 am by Rick Esenberg
” In 1986, after years of confused and contradictory litigation in the lower courts, the Supreme Court affirmed the possibility of political-gerrymandering claims in Davis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 5:28 am by Lee Davis
The data, apparently obtained with a phone company’s help, led to a warrantless search of the motor home and the seizure of incriminating evidence.The majority opinion held that there was no constitutional violation of the defendant’s rights because he “did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data given off by his voluntarily procured pay-as-you-go cellphone.”The panel drew a distinction between its ruling and a ruling by the Supreme Court last January in United… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by GuestPost
We need to dismantle this Unjust system city by city, state by state and country by country. [read post]