Search for: "General Products Corp" Results 2861 - 2880 of 6,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 3:52 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In the complaint, GPH states that the Proposed Respondents import and sell products that infringe the asserted patents. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 10:35 pm
The patent also may not do a good job of describing what is important about the technology in general (as opposed to describing the "invention" covered by the patent). [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:31 pm
The FDA's strategy also suffers from vagueness problems with its ‘minimally manipulated' dichotomy.Adding to Merrill's critique, any decision based on the method of production rather than the end product itself would run counter to the general theme of bioequivalency that pervades the FDA's regulation of all of the products under its aegis.All this leaves one to wonder whether, in the race to mimic… [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Russell Jackson
The North Carolina court had concluded that because at least some of the subsidiaries' products ultimately ended up in North Carolina, North Carolina could exercise general jurisdiction over them. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:45 pm
" Datascope Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
The most compelling case-in-point is likely Stonite Products Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:27 am
(Patent Office’s rejection of Glivec’s second variant) (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Sweden: Anti-counterfeit barcode technology trialled in Sweden (Managing Intellectual Property) US: ACLU, PUBPAT and others file lawsuit challenging constitutionality of patents on human genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer: Association for Molecular Pathology et al v USPTO et al (Inventive Step) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) US: Biotech sector highly critical of Commission’s… [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 397 F.3d 878 (10th Cir. 2005) (discussing but not deciding specific causation and the need for relative risk greater than two; no reliable showing of general causation) Barrow v. [read post]