Search for: "Jones v. United States" Results 2861 - 2880 of 3,443
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
United States On 16 June 2014, in the case of Sarah Jones v Dirty World Entertainment [pdf] the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a libel judgment in favour of a former cheerleader for the Cincinnati Bengals Football Team. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
United States The Hill reports that President Trump’s reelection campaign is suing CNN for defamation over articles about Russian efforts to assist the Presidents 2016 presidential bid. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am by Guest Blogger
It has been nearly 40 years since the Court in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times discusses a legislative response to United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by Schachtman
” The law firm of Jones Day, representing tobacco mega-defendant R. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
” The law firm of Jones Day, representing tobacco mega-defendant R. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States In South Carolina the case of Charleston City Paper has confirmed libel law principles, Blog Law Online comments. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am by Thomas C. Berg - Guest
United States is whether this emerging situation should lead the courts – ultimately, the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:37 am by SHG
  Take CNN, for example, who provided a bully pulpit to George Washington Professor Amitai Etzioni to opine about the constitutionality of GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Aila Hoss
Supreme Court stated in Seminole Nation v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
  There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]