Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States" Results 2861 - 2880 of 3,661
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:15 am by Lisa McElroy
  First Amendment and Confrontation Clause cases always garner a lot of attention, but over the last several years, after 2005’s United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:19 am by Calvin Massey
   The key to the Court's decision was its conclusion that the messages displayed by the Westboro picketers, though "short of refined social or political commentary," were commentary on matters of "public import" -- "the political and moral conduct of the United States and its citizens, the fate of our Nation, homosexuality in the military, and scandals involving the Catholic clergy. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by Sam Conforti
Insider hacking reached 48% of overall hacking activity in the 2010 Data Breach Investigations Report by Verizon Business, an IP communications and information technology service, and the United States Secret Service (USSS). [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm by Fred Abrams
Brozman, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:50 am by Big Tent Democrat
After all, before Citizens United, the restrictions overturned in that case were also long held to be constitutional. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  In other words, as long as the shares were listed on a foreign exchange, Section 10(b) was inapplicable even if the trade occurred in the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Nor are developing countries likely to model their legal system on countries with first amendment protection, such as the United States, if the verdicts are 15 times higher than in the United Kingdom[6]. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:19 am by SHG
Nor is it likely to help the state’s budget prospects even in the long run: contrary to what you may have heard, public-sector workers in Wisconsin and elsewhere are paid somewhat less than private-sector workers with comparable qualifications, so there’s not much room for further pay squeezes. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
   Yet lower courts have read into the language an intent to exempt foreign securities even if the trade occurs in the United States. [read post]