Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 2861 - 2880 of 5,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
, § 7-104(d) of the Criminal Law Article (the `theft statute’), Mr. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:26 am by Brittany Williams
The Court of Appeals also held that the lack of felonious intent negated the defendant’s ability to be convicted of the offense of felonious breaking or entering, and remanded the matter in order for the trial court to enter judgment against defendant for misdemeanor breaking or entering, which does not require felonious intent. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 12:28 pm by Shea Denning
Brewer, 05 DHC 37 Reprimand at 26 n.9 (April 4, 2008) (citing Richard A. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:07 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Book Review Monday: Insidious Competition solipsism – n. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:20 pm
This latter bit caused the judge to note that "[i]n other words, ASC's counsel explained that ASC could not be responsible for its own actions. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
 creditors who are seeking to claw back money from the media company’s former shareholders” when, “[i]n an unusual statement, two justices said without explanation that the Supreme Court might lack the six-justice quorum needed to act in the case. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
“[A]n unauthorized use of a photograph is not a literally false statement, even if the image was altered,” without more. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:36 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
There, the missing claimlimitation—step D of steps A-D—was nothing more thanan instruction to repeat steps A, B, and C until a particularquantity of email was sent in accordance with theclaim. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 5:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Scheduling Divisional Court Matters … 4. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The fact that DoorDash wasn’t a direct competitor didn’t matter after Lexmark. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:46 pm by Kent Scheidegger
" Brief in Opposition 13, n. 7.In my view, these offers, the lack of any meaningful challenge as to their appropriateness, and the Government's uncontested commitment to continue to work to resettle petitioners transform petitioners' claim. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
(Patent Docs) Immutol and ImmuPet (Norwegian Beta-1,3/1,6-Glucan) – US: When (claimed) size matters – Biopolymer appeals summary judgment finding no infringement: Biopolymer v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[57] This matters to both sides. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]