Search for: "New v. State"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 107,445
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2021, 11:08 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:36 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:08 am
Last year, in District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
In Goonewardene v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
In Moses v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:35 am
Just last month, New Mexico passed legislation to repeal a 1969 abortion ban, removing the threat that it could go back into effect — an essential safeguard for a state that already provides a haven to those who cannot access care in their home state. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The Secretary of State appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
In State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:28 am
The latter appears to be the case in State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
No, said a Texas court in Enerquest Oil & Gas, LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:52 am
Yeaples v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:42 pm
The New York State Court Appeals heard oral arguments today in Goldstein v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am
They stated that the Court had no hesitation in concluding that it should do so in the present case. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am
Seventhly, OBG has been understood to impose a dealing requirement by the courts both in this country and elsewhere in the Commonwealth, such as New Zealand, Singapore, Australia and Canada. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Consequently, any inability by Finelite to state a claim for restitution does not constitute a bar to Finelite's seeking injunctive relief. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
Melissa Carrington, Note, Applying Apprendi to Jury Sentencing: Why State Felony Jury Sentencing Threatens the Right to a Jury Trial, (Apprendi v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:28 pm
United States Department of the Interior (official tribal government)Fritcher v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
The State’s reduction of its employer contribution for health insurance premiums for judges was an unconstitutional diminution of judicial compensationBransten v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 03214, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSitting and retired members of the New York State Judiciary challenged the State’s recent decrease in its employer contribution to the cost of the judges' health insurance premiums,… [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:32 pm
On January 17, 2012, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, declined to follow and expressly overruled the insurance rule adopted in DiGuglielmo v. [read post]
