Search for: "S&S CONTRACTING"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 134,579
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2013, 9:11 am
Here’s are a couple reviews on Amazon: After repeatedly trying and failing to find a good hornbook to supplement Barnett’s contract casebook, I discovered “The Oxford Introductions to U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 9:15 am
" Specifically excluded from that definition are "consumer contract[s] or . . .. employment contract[s]. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 5:23 am
Their approach is often excessive and based on misunderstandings of the remedy’s effects. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 2:39 pm
A party will sometimes seek to enjoin or compel another’s conduct to prevent them from causing irreparable harm through their action or inaction. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:30 am
Last week, Jennifer Crittenden interviewed a contract Ombuds for her podcast, Dear Discrete Guide. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
GSU’s Argument: The Board of Regents denied all liability. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:05 pm
GSU’s Argument: The Board of Regents denied all liability. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:08 am
Remember that it is possible to modify fundamental terms marked (F+) and Supplementary terms (S) in the model contracts. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:08 am
My point is a practical one: in most instances China’s courts are better than all of the alternatives for pursuing recourse against a Chinese company. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 12:32 pm
Because the Court found no ambiguity in the contracts, it rejected the insurer’s invitation to consider anything beyond the four corners of the contracts themselves. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 3:38 am
It's an easy case because the contract at issue is flat-out illegal in New Jersey. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
If you are taking on a project to the owner’s benefit, each party should offer similar indemnification for damaging items in their control. 3rd Party Indemnification – Take a look at that indemnification clause closely. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
However, because of the government’s special position, government contracts often contain clauses unique to agreements between the government and private entities. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
Today's advance release contract law opinions: Bradley v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 3:17 pm
McCloud Community Services District, the Court of Appeal rejected a citizen group's claim that the District violated CEQA by approving a contract with a water bottling company to develop and sell the District's mountain spring water without conducting environmental review. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:11 am
Business relationships involve deals, deal making, business models and contracts. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
The District also submitted the deposition testimony of a District employee who testified that he observed a personnel file in the documents removed from Plaintiff's office.The Appellate Division said that viewing District's submissions in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, "as we must," it concluded that the District failed "to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact whether Plaintiff's actions constituted a repudiation of… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:21 pm
Caveat emptor when contracting with the government; it's not your usual contracting party, since it has the power to alter its own obligations by its regulatory powers, and there is little a court will do to stop it. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Even with this new law, it is important to note that generally Illinois courts abhor restrictive covenants and noncompete agreements that are not abundantly reasonable in time and geographic area and are focused solely on protecting an employer’s legitimate special interests. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: Below is today's contract law Appellate Court opinion: AC31447 - Walpole Woodworkers, Inc. v. [read post]
