Search for: "Seales v. State" Results 2861 - 2880 of 3,449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On 20 and 21 July 2022, the Master of the Rolls, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division and Lady Justice King heard The Guardian’s appeal challenging the decision to exclude the press from the September 2021 hearing for the will of Prince Philip, where it was decided it should be sealed for 90 years. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:59 am by Patrick Kennelly
The Kremlin then scrapped the massive military processions for the May 9 V-Day celebrations and the constitutional referendum that was set for April 22, a vote that would allow Putin to extend his rule to 2036. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
If You Have No Will in NJCompiled By Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.If you leave no Will or your Will is declared invalid because it was improperly prepared or is not admissible to probate:* State law determines who gets assets, not you * Additional expenses will be incurred and extra work will be required to qualify an administrator-Surety Bond, additional costs and legal fees * Judge determines who gets custody of your children * Possible additional State inheritance taxes and Federal… [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am by Florian Mueller
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Deference in assessing evidence is exacerbated by the increasing practice of accepting evidence from the executive in a ‘sealed cover’ and adjudicating without disclosing this material to opposing parties, citing security concerns. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
Furthermore, the arbitrary choice to exclude two major telecom equipment providers on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations of foreign government influence, severely upsets the desired balance between the free movement of goods and a State’s security interests. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
  There is an unpublished Second Circuit opinion that appears to squarely reject this argument (United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:04 am by Russ Bensing
”  The basis for this is the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]