Search for: "State of Miss. v. United States" Results 2861 - 2880 of 4,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
In Edwards v United Kinghdom (2002) 35 EHRR 19, it said only that: …there must be a sufficient element of public scrutiny of the investigation or its results to secure accountability in practice as well as in theory. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States, Brandeis upheld ex parte naturalization proceedings). [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
It looked to the recent case involving Dred Pirate Roberts and Silk Road, namely, United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: CAFC denies outsourcing of inventorship to foreign countries: Solvay v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  But might So might one describe pre-2022 MLB as a form of “federalism” in which constituent units, each with their own measure of “sovereignty” were entitled to make their own rules, at least up to a point? [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm by Marie Louise
Christian Dior Couture and Iyad Habas (IP Factor) Miss Sexy and Miss Sixty not confusingly similar (IP Factor) Wrangling over procedure vs. substance (IP Factor) Recent Israel oral exams illegal and candidates who failed should be allowed to resit (IP Factor)   Nigeria Mexican standoff in Nigeria (Innovationpartners)   Poland Warsaw hosts unified patent litigation system conference next month (PatLit) RED BLUE v RED BULL (Class 46)   Switzerland Foreign… [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 12:50 pm by McKennon Law Group
United States, 781 F.2d 1334, 1345 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1054, 107 S.Ct. 928, 93 L.Ed.2d 979 (1987)); see Greenwald v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:03 am by Russ Bensing
We note such misconduct is certainly of the type to warrant review by Tennessee’s United States Attorney’s Office. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
Counsel for petitioner argues that the `Wall of Shame' is a form of punishment that is beyond the authority of the COUNTY EXECUTIVE to impose . . . and violates the United States and New York State Constitutions by depriving petitioner of due process. . . . [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:51 am by Schachtman
  Professor David Kaye collected examples of statistical blunders from published cases in a 1986 law review, and again in his chapter on statistical evidence in the Federal Judicial Center’s Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence created a list of erroneous interpretations: United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2025, 12:59 pm by Hayden Johnson
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919) (Holmes, J., dissenting); Police Dep’t of City of Chicago v. [read post]