Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 2861 - 2880 of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm by INFORRM
  This was recognised by the last Government’s Working Group on Libel Reform (discussed in a post by one of its members Gavin Phillipson and by the Canadian Supreme Court when it sought to formulate a public interest defence last year (in Grant v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
The Court stated that California state courts have not embraced the Ninth Circuit’s narrow restraint exception and stated “no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts have been clear in their expression that section 16660 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat”… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:50 am
The Wall Street Journal reports on the ruling in Varnum v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Finally, it reflects a strong presumption that those who chose to form their entity in a particular state desire to have their legal relations governed by the laws of that state. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Tackett detected a strong smell of alcohol as appellant walked by him. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:19 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Germany ] [Habitual Residence] In Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1890857 (M.D.Fla.) [read post]