Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 61,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Plaintiff's preliminary appeal statement filed with New York State's Court of Appeals seeking "leave to appeal" judicial decisions handed down in Sander v Westchester Reform Temple [Defendants] (228 AD3d 688) asks whether the content of a blog posted outside of work is within the ambit of a protected recreational activity within the meaning of §201-d(2)(c)* of New York State's Labor Law .Supreme Court had… [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Plaintiff's preliminary appeal statement filed with New York State's Court of Appeals seeking "leave to appeal" judicial decisions handed down in Sander v Westchester Reform Temple [Defendants] (228 AD3d 688) asks whether the content of a blog posted outside of work is within the ambit of a protected recreational activity within the meaning of §201-d(2)(c)* of New York State's Labor Law .Supreme Court had… [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
New York State’s Human Rights Law does not protect an employee from all retaliation, only from retaliation that results in an injury or harmNapierala v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2016 NY Slip Op 04832, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentLisa Napierala challenged New York State Division of Human Rights’ [SDHR] determination of "no probable cause" with respect to her complaint that Erie Community College [ECC] had retaliated against… [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:10 am
In Huri v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:14 am
See Thomson v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:54 am
United States, the ongoing constitutional challenge to FOSTA/SESTA. 5. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm
It argued that a decision from 1945, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:27 am
As 2019 came to a close, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Great Minds v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 4:38 pm
The case, Parent v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
ASCAP v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am
Only Justice Brett Kavanaugh alluded to the 400,000 individuals granted TPS, most of whom have been living and working in the United States for decades, whose prospects of permanent residence would be eliminated by the Supreme Court’s affirmance of the decision by the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:40 am
AFP v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
§1257 under Michigan v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
Regarding mutuality, the Order states: “In light of [AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
The United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Madray v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:03 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 8:47 am
Incarcerated Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:04 pm
He went to work for EDO and worked with one James Martin. [read post]