Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 2881 - 2900 of 4,453
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
  A “covered jurisdiction” could be an entire state, or a county, city or other governmental unit at the local level. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:07 pm by Gene Takagi
There have been a few cases involving charities and purported support of terrorist organizations, including United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm by Dani Selby
Though the anti-sodomy laws were declared unconstitutional in the 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Jeff Gamso
Here's how Chief Justice Rehnquist accounted for this sort of mess in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Oklahoma state law provides that “if a vacancy or irrevocable resignation occurs in the office of a member of the United States Senate from Oklahoma” the state must hold a special election to fill the empty or to-be-empty seat. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Ayo Aladesanmi
The environmental justice movement has a long and storied history in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States In the case of Fridman and ors v Bean LLC and Glenn Simpson (Case 17-20141 [pdf]) a Federal judge has refused a motion by the defendant to dismiss libel proceedings brought over over the Memoranda in the “Trump Dossier”. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:47 am by Sarah Turberville
There are just sixteen counties (out of over three thousand in the United States) where five or more death sentences have been imposed between 2010-2015. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
The article then takes the early history of workers’ compensation laws in the United States as a case study for the theoretical account of disability and capitalism, arguing that those laws created new incentives for discrimination against disabled people and thus re-organized the process of disabling. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am by David Markus
United States, which asks the question: Was it the government that went overboard? [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:42 pm by Lisa Ouellette
But the Court’s decision said nothing about the argument of the United States as amicus curiae that official immunity should still be available, so this issue remains undetermined. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm by Steve Vladeck
” Thus, Urbanski stressed, the only question a federal habeas court should ask is whether that determination “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]