Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 2881 - 2900 of 16,697
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
Third-Party Certification and Cross-Border Flows in the GDPR: Which Workable Option? [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 12:32 pm by Georgialee Lang
The Court stated that litigants certainly had an “opportunity” to cross-examine an expert, but they were not obliged to do so . [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:06 am by Kristian Soltes
“Unlike some jurisdictions, here in the United States we continue to see strong demand for cash,” he said during a panel on cross-border payments and digital currencies hosted Monday by the International Monetary Fund. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 8:54 am by Flupke van den Bogart
The Commission is currently consulting Member States on their views on the upcoming review and will launch a public consultation in the beginning of 2021. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Gerson Alvarenga-Flores was apprehended crossing the U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Note that there are two more cases pending Case C-746/18 H.K. v Prokurator (Opinion handed down by AG Pitruzzella 21 Jan 2020) as well as references from Germany from 2019 and Ireland from 2020. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Rather than focus on an explicit discussion of whether common-law dissolution is available to LLCs, however, the Court focused its attention on a secondary legal question: whether a 50% member of an LLC can state a viable claim for common-law dissolution. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Dirk Sandefur's majority opinion (jointed by Justices Laurie McKinnon, Beth Baker, and Ingrid Gustafson) in State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:17 pm by Pedro Celis
That question is the crux of the Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
Despite lots of its own inconsistency, the Supreme Court adopted this view in 1866 in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Austin Campbell
  However, if an employer has dispensed with its policy for an unlawful reason such as retaliation or discrimination, that may cross the line into being illegal under state or federal law. [read post]