Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2023, 1:35 pm
The DEA has the final authority to reschedule a drug and will now initiate its own review of marijuana, a process that does not have any definitive timeline but could be moved along if determined to be an agency priority. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
Id. at 1-2. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 9:46 am
The Bill The Expansion of California Family Rights Act, AB 1041, was signed into law by Governor Newsom on September 29, 2022. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 8:43 am
As reported by WITN.com, “[the shooting] happened around 1:40 a.m. at [a] Night Club on Stone Rose Drive. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:38 pm
The Memo advises the NLRB’s regional field offices, but it does not formally make college athletes employees of their respective academic institutions. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 3:35 am
July 29, 2008). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
(Laws of 2019, Ch 523, § 3, effective November 20, 2019)Laws of 2019, Ch 434 enacted October 29, 2019, amended Family Court Act § 1028-a (i), effective October 29, 2019. [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:20 pm
Topics 1 to 3 were dealt with in Part 1, topics 4 to 10 are dealt with in this post. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm
Oral proceedings were held on 29 January 2020 in the absence of the respondent. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] Jed Rubenfeld and William P. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
Does getting the local media involved help a client? [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
A contract cannot take away this overtime pay entitlement.[6] Falconbridge does, however, reference the collective agreement when determining what a “work week” actually is, since ESA does not clearly command this aspect of the contract. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
' will elicit the same answer from everyone, but it does not on that account produce an ‘involuntary' response.[19]Where the Henn court thought the question of voluntariness turned is the following: (1) if the person receives information about the consequences of his choices; (2) if the choice is free from fraud or other misconduct; and, (3) if the person has an opportunity to say no.[20] The Henn court further state that:[T]he fact that he still found… [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:37 am
., Cancellation No. 92057088 (June 29, 2015) [precedential].Although the proceeding was couched in terms of priority and likelihood of confusion under Section 2(a), the crux of the dispute was the issue of ownership. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 4:48 am
The decision does not elaborate as to what these serious reasons may constitute. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
McDonald's is (or, rather, was) the owner of the word mark 'BIG MAC' for the following goods and services in Classes 29, 30 and 42 of the Nice Classification:Supermac filed an application under Article 58(1)(a) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation, requesting the revocation - in its entirety - of 'BIG MAC', on grounds that the mark would have not been put to genuine use for a continuous period of 5 years.In response to the application, McDonald's submitted… [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:04 am
Sept. 29, 2015) (“Final Decision”); Cerro Wire, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 1:00 am
BVG responded and argued: 1. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 9:15 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:07 am
On November 29, 2016, the Judicial Reforms Subcommittee approved Congress House Bill No. 1 (Death Penalty Law), which would reinstate capital punishment for “heinous crimes,” including murder, piracy, and the trafficking and possession of illegal drugs. [read post]
