Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 12,792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2013, 4:48 pm
Id. at 1. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
But section 29 does not apply in certain circumstances, one of which, relied on by Ms Thomas, is where the unregistered interest overrides the registered disposition under schedule 3 of the act. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:02 am
Slip op. at 29-30. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Cal. 2006); see also Saffon, supra, 522 F.3d at 870; 29 CFR § 2560.503–1(g). [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 5:01 am
What can/does the IAT measure? [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 7:37 pm
Evidence collected to date does not link all illnesses to this establishment. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:10 pm
Sept. 10, 2013).Issues[1] “Because the district court failed to appreciate that the language describing display ‘in an unobtrusive manner that does not distract a user’ is tied to specific type of display described in the specification [of invalidated claims 4–8, 11, 34, and 35 of U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
’On 29 March the Advocate General gave his Opinion or, one might say, his Opinions: (1) principally: ‘(a) Article 6(1) ... [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 1:08 pm
One example of an exception is section 29.4(1). [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Sept. 29, 2016). [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
This law will take effect upon signature by Governor Terry McAuliffe or, if he does not sign or veto the bill, on March 29, 2015. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:38 pm
This court assumes that it does apply, but found that the fines are not excessive. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:26 am
The rate of filing among 35 to 44 year olds decreased from 29% to 27.54%. 5. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
That proposition is plainly correct.[4] The appellant asserts that A 77(3), in contrast to A 77(1) and (2), does not attribute responsibility for forwarding applications to any specific party and that the applicant has overall responsibility for observance of the relevant time limits. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:28 pm
§ 213(a)(1)) does not grant the Department the authority to use a salary-level test or an automatic updating mechanism under its revised overtime rule. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:30 am
P. 26(b)(1). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:23 am
†The John Marshall Law Review, 29, 171-202. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:42 pm
In re Provine, 312 S.W.3d 824, 828–29 (Tex. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:33 pm
Compiled by Kenneth A. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:03 am
For instance, if the new sentence is 30 years with all but 1 year suspended and 4 years of probation, Armstrong will be required to serve a sentence of 29-years in prison instead of the 30 years required under the original sentence. [read post]
