Search for: "German v. German"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 5,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
CJEU confirms extrajudicial costs are 'other expenses' which may be claimed in IP infringement cases
30 Jun 2022, 8:35 am
The CJEU recently rendered a ruling in the case of Koch Media v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:10 am
Matthew explains why Sweden and Switzerland are fighting over a crypto company widely reported to have been compromised by US and German intelligence fifty years ago. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:13 pm
Circuit Court’s judgment affirming Judge Tanya Chutkan’s April 19 transfer injunction in Doe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 12:21 am
Since August I had reported on various Nokia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 10:21 am
Yesterday an HTC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:19 am
Bush v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 3:37 pm
This time it was Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and Ors [2020] EWHC 1273 (Ch), regarding issues remitted by the Court of Appeal back in November 2017 [fun fact: also the month that Salvator Mundi became the most expensive painting ever sold, at a cool $450,312,500.]Quick recap: Merck KGgA (Merck Global) is a German company that traces its roots back to 1668. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 3:30 am
Even the Germans did. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:30 pm
Arguments regarding the use being de minimis and the impact of the German doctrine of equilibrium were both considered.So why was the case remitted to the High Court? [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 5:15 am
In the wake of the David Petraeus scandal, in which the FBI gained back-end access to the gmail accounts of the CIA director's paramour, I ran across Google's semi-annual transparency statement, in which we learn that in the first six months of 2012, Google granted all or part of 90% of information requests from US law enforcement agencies, handing out information on 16,281 users in response to 7,969 requests.Comparing requests by country (Google provides only top-line national data, so we… [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 4:36 am
The ancient Greek word 'αστήρ' (transliterated as aster) found itself in the centre of Community trade mark (CTM) opposition proceedings and the General Court's judgment in Case T‑521/13, Alpinestars Research Srl v OHIM / Kean Tung Cho and Ling-Yuan Wang Yu. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 2:19 am
That is the question that, on the other side of the Pond, the Dusseldorf Regional Court referred to the European Court of Justice in Nokia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:46 am
I still believe that Microsoft is going to win the Google Maps case, and at today's IPCom v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 1:30 am
Balema produce a German 'balsamic vinegar' called "Balsamico" made from Baden wine. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:12 am
This weblog has not been uniformly impressed with FIFA's intellectual property activities over the years (see eg "Fifa scandal: the sponsors awaken", here; "FIFA's unfair catenaccio on World Cup's IP", here; "Ferrero v FIFA (in the World Cup trade mark dispute) -- 1:0 says the German BGH", here; "Put those vuvuzelas away, here comes FIFA", here; "Pants off in Anti-Ambush Marketing Frenzy", here;… [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am
There have been instances when highly creative unconventional works, such as the assembly of a scene or a Stormtrooper helmet, were not found eligible for copyright protection because they could not be pigeon-holed within any of the eight categories of works that UK law protects.Having said this, it would now seem that compliance with EU law requires adoption of open-ended subject-matter categorisations, as is already the case under, say, French, German and Italian laws. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 12:56 pm
In some German towns and executioner was permitted three strikes (really) before being being grabbed by the crowd and forced to die in place of the poor sinner.In his concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
