Search for: "In re E.G." Results 2881 - 2900 of 13,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2021, 3:50 am
" Royal Crown, 127 USPQ2d at 1046 (quoting Cordua Rests., 118 USPQ2d at 1638); In re Wm. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 7:19 am
All they’re trying to do is create a better alternative for people who are looking for that option. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 11:29 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
AND "looks like a duck" comes up:Even though patent agents practice before theUSPTO in the same way patent lawyers do, a majority ofthe other courts that have considered this issue haveconcluded that an agent-client privilege does not exist.See, e.g., In re Rivastigmine Patent Litig., 237 F.R.D. 69,102 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (“But it does not follow that becausethe agent is permitted to engage in this defined subuniverseof legal practice, his activities are therefore… [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
 With a criminal case, you're being charged with a particular offense, and you can't be charged with that offense again. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:29 pm by Sandy Levinson
Frank,, dissenting alas, about Wisconsin's efforts re voter suppression.) [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:09 am
Hadid’s day-to-day life that paparazzi make a living by exploiting her image and selling it for profit” and that the case demonstrates a rising trend in photographer/agencies seeking monetary damages from celebrities after they re-post images of themselves that they find already available online. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 5:00 am by beng
This assistance helps you save time and can also reduce errors (e.g., typos) that pop up when you are grinding through an especially busy day. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 12:55 pm by Ron Friedmann
The “lowest common denominator” comment, prompts a re-visit. [read post]
15 May 2017, 3:00 am by Biglaw Investor
The actor (i.e. the investor himself) is likely to attribute such savings to situational factors (e.g. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
By contrast, elsewhere it might not make as much sense to think of the problem as a lost opportunity to license, e.g., the listing of someone as a terrorist. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Not clear we have a right answer in © but at least we’re thinking about it. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
  And, in any event -- and this is her central point -- we don't want the federal 30-day rule to vary in application depending on the vagaries of particular state rules about service of process; e.g., who "counts" as the agent for the company.So we're going to have a simple rule. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
E.g., sharing is good/feeding the hungry, but you don’t have to do so every time you’re asked; it’s instead that if you never do it then you’re not a good member of society. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Information is easily stripped out, e.g. by screen capture. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  E.g., musician represented by AF&M in his/her employment—is that © employee status? [read post]