Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 42,197
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2012, 10:31 am
Stephen Bilkis & Associates have legal counsel who are very meticulous with the evidence in their cases. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 5:27 pm
It is this latter requirement that precludes a matter from being referred to trial on the basis of mere assertions.In this case, the Court of Appeal found that Mary Richter had sufficient evidence to establish a trial issue. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:42 pm
An “abuse of discretion occurs when a district court base[s] its ruling on an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence, or render[s] a decision that cannot be located within the range of permissible decisions. [read post]
15 May 2013, 12:42 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently granted certification in the matter of Heimeshoff v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 5:13 am
**Of the matter of --bright-line rule -- cases, it is true that the Supreme Court rejected a bright-line rule proposed by the CAFC in Festo. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 6:23 pm
District Court for the District ofDelaware granting judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”)against Idenix and finding that U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:07 am
Nevertheless, the court determined that, as a matter of law, each of the violations qualified as a violation of either a safety rule of major significance or a workplace conduct rule. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:44 am
There are specific rules regarding the type of evidence that the judge is allowed to consider. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
The firm has extensive experience with the complex appeals process and federal court litigation of ERISA matters. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:21 am
" Rule 801(c), SCRE. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:36 am
Without getting into details of the rules and jurisprudence around expert evidence, as a general statement, the Court is to exercise a “gatekeeper” function - admitting the opinion evidence of experts where the subject matter of the evidence is outside of the expertise of judges (and provided it meets certain other criteria) and excluding the rest. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 5:35 am
The price of not suppressing evidence when police violate the law is the loss of our Fourth Amendment protections. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 1:56 pm
Lord Justice Toulson (with whom Sweeney and Sharp JJ agreed) summarised the effect of the Chairman’s rulings on anonymity as follows: He has made a positive decision in principle to receive anonymous evidence from journalists who wish to conceal their identity because of fear of career blight, but that is a general ruling. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
We note that the Board was entitled to reject claimant's medical evidence even though there was no other medical evidence presented on the issue of causation (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d 1236, 1238 [3d Dept 2019]; Matter of Bradley v US Airways, Inc., 58 AD3d 1043, 1045 [3d Dept 2009]). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
We note that the Board was entitled to reject claimant's medical evidence even though there was no other medical evidence presented on the issue of causation (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d 1236, 1238 [3d Dept 2019]; Matter of Bradley v US Airways, Inc., 58 AD3d 1043, 1045 [3d Dept 2009]). [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
Accent appealed this ruling and the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:27 pm
Hearing officers will have the discretion to control the filing, subject matter, and timing of any post-hearing briefs. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
The only evidence the Section 809 Panel provides of this supposed problem is a single email from this individual. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
Evidence relying on the 25 percent rule of thumb is thus inadmissible under Daubert and the Federal Rules of Evidence, because it fails to tie a reasonable royalty base to the facts of the case at issue. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:19 am
[I think it's fair to say that Opposer was not wearing the white hat in this matter - ed.]. [read post]
