Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Most areas of law contain ambiguity, a fact that many law students resent but ought to embrace; if legal questions yielded mathematically precise answers, most anyone could be a good lawyer. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 8:12 am
Parker v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:51 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 4:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 6:16 pm
Pfaff v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:31 pm
By Andrew DelaneyANR v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:50 pm
Also what this seems to do is create yet more uncertainty as to what precisely the standard is for consumers under the Competition Act (i.e., an “average consumer”, “credulous, inexperienced consumer” or other lower or higher standards depending on the factual circumstances). [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:15 am
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Which brings us to 2013, and the case of Xuedan Wang v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
” Under this standard, Green Day’s use was transformative. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:56 am
Cariou v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:19 pm
These results are gathered using a more precise method and unlike the PBT results, they can be used in the DUI case to prove your BAL. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:14 am
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 1:41 pm
But the whole point of giving copyright in photos based on the creative choices made by the photographer was to recognize the creativity of the photographic enterprise, which is precisely the reason that termination was thought to be problematic when a derivative work was involved. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 12:54 pm
In Boaz v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 10:51 am
Conclusion Although the Second Circuit stopped short of requiring plaintiffs to “plead their hours with mathematical precision,” it explained that Dejesus, along with its decisions in Lundy and Nakahata, are intended to reflect the tension between: (1) the possible use by plaintiffs’ counsel of “standardized, bare-bones complaints” to engage in “fishing expeditions” for potential defendants “about whom they have little or no… [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 6:32 am
Pleading standards. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
He posted our office addresses and phone numbers, and then — using the rhetorical device of pretending that we had been "whining" about being "targeted" — said the following. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 6:34 pm
More recently, in the 2008 military commission case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:00 am
As the Court held in Fisher v. [read post]
