Search for: "People v. Sole" Results 2881 - 2900 of 6,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of State for… [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  A plaintiff whose PII, PFI, or PPI was stolen by hackers typically brings suit against the hacked company on his or her own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated people, hoping the presiding court will certify the proposed class and allow the case to proceed as a class action.[3]  Causes of action in customer cases run a wide gamut of legal theories, from traditional tort claims (negligence and fraud) to allegations of state and federal statutory violations (for… [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Pro content created by people who want to earn a living should be treated differently versus other content. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s where the imbalance comes: relatively manageable cost of doing business v. creation side is being killed by piracy and dealing w/great burdens from §512 to little effect. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 JC: give us more of flavor of how much of your takedown effort is automated v. human and what interaction is? [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:48 pm by Peter Margulies
The U.S. military Central Command (Centcom) report on the attack on the Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) hospital at Kunduz, Afghanistan demonstrates how a perfect storm of mistakes and mishaps can lead to tragic results. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am by Lyle Denniston
  In the case raising that issue (Star Athletica v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am by Emma Cross
Stone & Rolls was a company created solely for the purposes of defrauding banks. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:45 am by Schachtman
The defendant confronts this evidence solely on cross-examination, and not by trying to suggest that the plaintiff’s expert witness’s analysis is actually evidence of safety. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:02 am by Claire Darbourne and guestauthor
In Cox v Ministry of Justice, Mrs Cox was employed by the prison service as catering manager and ran a prison kitchen. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:21 am by John Jascob
Even if liability turned solely on Newman, the SEC continued, the conduct remains illegal because unlike Holley, the insiders in Newman tipped only casual acquaintances, not close friends or family members, and did not intend to benefit the people they tipped. [read post]