Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 5,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
*A lesser enterprise than Louis Vuitton might have heaved a sigh of relief and concentrated its energies in the manufacture of lock-bearing underwear, socks and pyjamas. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
The plaintiffs in Genereux v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
The Lanham Act provides that any person who “misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of goods and services” could be subjected to a suit. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:45 am
KIND LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:53 pm
And it must not rely on overbroad generalizations about the different talents, capacities, or preferences of males and females as held in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:52 am
Readers of this weblog will instantly recall this Kat's blogpost of 21 January on Société Des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 16 (Ch), in which Mr Justice Arnold referred the following questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling before deciding on the registrability of the image (right) of the Kit Kat chocolate fingers as a three-dimensional trade mark for various goods in Class 30 ranging from chocolate… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
Today the United States Supreme Court ruled in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Canada’s Federal Court addressed this issue in H-D U.S.A., LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
The Court’s decision is good news for the oil and gas industry. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
The Court’s decision is good news for the oil and gas industry. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 10:37 am
The Court’s decision is good news for the oil and gas industry. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Most tellingly, it would reverse Buckley v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:05 pm
United States. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:08 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
If Madison were truly the chief architect of the Constitution, what he said and wrote (in 1787) bears heavily on the meaning of that document. [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:56 am
In this case, the Supreme Court resolves two clashing principles: the right to speak your mind and protest before government officials, and the need to protect the President of the United States from assassination.The case is Wood v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 10:48 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:00 am
Cruz v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
The defendant relies upon the case of State of Columbia v Heller. [read post]
23 May 2014, 1:39 pm
” O’Neill v. [read post]
