Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 44,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2015, 10:53 am
In United Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:04 am
The court also cited 1906's Hale v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
Traditional tax administration involves a state tax authority’s careful examination of taxpayer’s records to determine whether the taxpayer complied with the tax law. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
He thinks that the judge got it wrong in denying attorneys fees AND denying fee-shifting in UMG Recordings, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:20 am
United States (Self-Determination Contract; Wrongful Death)City of Duluth v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 4:16 pm
Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 8:20 am
Staszak v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:14 pm
Connick v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
Groch v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:14 am
SKINNER V. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
According to state records, Daw has a projected release date in late 2021 for a fraud conviction. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:41 am
On Monday, the Court released its opinion in Bobby v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
Obama and Al-Odah v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:37 pm
By Robert Loblaw Koch v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:53 pm
Related Cases: Lagleva v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:55 am
Juliana v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Law Request v City of New York, 191 AD3d 504, ruled that where the custodian of the records [Custodian] had "no reasonable basis for denying access" to the records sought pursuant to FOIL, it was undisputed that Petitioner substantially prevailed" as Custodian, during the pendency of this proceeding, "disclosed the records sought in the FOIL request with limited redactions. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Law Request v City of New York, 191 AD3d 504, ruled that where the custodian of the records [Custodian] had "no reasonable basis for denying access" to the records sought pursuant to FOIL, it was undisputed that Petitioner substantially prevailed" as Custodian, during the pendency of this proceeding, "disclosed the records sought in the FOIL request with limited redactions. [read post]
