Search for: "C/T"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 50,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2015, 12:56 pm
In other words, Person A must make a bad statement to Person B (at least to Person B, though it could be more people, too) about Person C, and Person C must suffer some actual damages as a result. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:25 am
Seems unlikely it’s just b/c the Fed. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:22 am
Com. c. 27, margin page 358, ad finem.These are bedrock principles of Anglo-American jurisprudence. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Did a full replication study b/c didn’t have access to Liu’s data on reported cases (506); we found 86 using that methodology, 29% of which cited eBay. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 3:22 am
As this wasn't done the opposition should not be admissible. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
If the [d]ocumentary had merely used a number of excerpts from the [c]oncert [v]ideo, and hence of the [c]opyright [w]orks, then that might well have been reasonable having regard to the transformative purpose. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 12:01 pm
The Board won’t allow such reasonings:A 123(2)[2.1] The preamble and features (a), (c) and (f) of claim 1 are disclosed in originally filed claim 1 and at page 2, line 28 - page 3, line 3 of the description of the application as filed. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:38 am
” Id. at *9.Both prescribers testified that they didn’t care about the indications in the FDA-approved label. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Tout comme dans Chiasson c. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
This is a problem b/c design laws should incentivize the creation of new and creative aesthetic product designs. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:28 am
Read comments and post your comment hereTTABlog note: I haven't figured out why the Board did not consolidate these appeals and issue one opinion.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
30 Dec 2017, 4:01 pm
Understanding Ignorance: The Surprising Impact of What We Don’t Know. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The definition of the catalyst is found in page 4, lines 5 t 6 of the original description: “The catalyst of the process according to the invention contains a support, platinum and at least one further element. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:55 am
Eric Goldman's post Blogger Isn’t Liable for Anonymous Comments–Griffith v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
Camillo, Historian, Mississippi River Commission, USACEJeffrey Mitchell Brideau, Post-Doctoral Researcher, IWR, USACEMatthew T. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 1:57 pm
The answer is actually suggested by the question itself, and is quite simple: you just don’t know. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 3:17 am
Precedential No. 8: TTAB Affirms Section 2(a) Disparagement Refusal of PORNO JESUSSection 2(a) - False Association:Precedential No. 39: TTAB Dismisses 2(a) False Association Claim: MARATHON MONDAY vs.BOSTON MARATHONPrecedential No. 36: TTAB Gives the Boot to Nike's Inadequate Section 2(a) and 2(c) ClaimsPrecedential No. 4: TTAB Affirms 2(a) and 2(c) Refusals of "PRINCESS KATE" and "ROYAL KATE" for ClothingSection 2(c) - Consent to… [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am
.: Didn’t participate in this case b/c we have members on both sides. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:42 am
c) NO es necesario ninguna otra actividad. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 8:53 am
Whether the T/C erroneously considered fault in making what Husband claimed was an inequitable division of the marital estate: Here the COA again affirmed the T/C finding that fault was not the reason that the T/C gave Wife a larger portion of the marital estate. [read post]
