Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 14,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
The major Supreme Court media law case heard in the October Term 2014 was Elonis v United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
The Ping-Pong Game Begins Yes, said the administrator of the BWC. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:17 pm
The Supreme Court on Tuesday will consider the case of Herring v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sarkar v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 289 (19 March 2010) Maroudas v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280 (18 March 2010) Connor v Surrey County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 286 (18 March 2010) William Hare Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 283 (18 March 2010) Bloomsbury International Ltd & Ors. v The Sea Fish Industry Authority… [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:56 pm
Calls for the Biden administration’s views The justices asked the Biden administration to provide the federal government’s views in four cases: Interactive Wearables v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
” Further, the opinion continues, “New York courts will give administrative determinations preclusive effect if made in a quasijudicial capacity and with a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue,” citing Burkybile v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm
Administration for International Development that Contreras helped move to a settlement in the late 1990s, Evans et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
Conclusion: The district court did not err in declining to address Kolar's claim because he had not exhausted his administrative remedies. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
Perlmutter, P.C. v New York City Police Dept., 2014 NY Slip Op 08722, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Law Offices of Adam D. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Tierney were Principal Administrative Law Judges of the UIAB. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Tierney were Principal Administrative Law Judges of the UIAB. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:05 am
Reviewing body must have jurisdiction to consider disciplinary appealsMontella v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 93 NY2d 424Although Section 75 of the Civil Service Law sets out what is probably the best-known statutory procedure for initiating disciplinary action against employees in the classified service, other statutory procedures are available for this purpose.* The Montella decision by the Court of Appeals points out the fact that one must consider the basis for the… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:28 am
Supreme Court heard argument in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 9:36 pm
The Court rejected the allegations of the applicants (Provitel v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 2:48 pm
County of Durham Office of the Sheriff Department, 2016 U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm
Gundy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
This term, the Supreme Court granted the government’s petition for certiorari in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
In Inter-Cooperative Exchange v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 11:01 am
In Coronado v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
This morning, the Supreme Court decided to hear Moore v. [read post]
