Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 2901 - 2920 of 37,134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2013, 2:32 am
  The Review Committee was given the following Terms of Reference: 1. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
” and“When silver is incorporated in the medium, it will be added at a concentration of at least 10 nM, preferably 100 nM, more preferably 1 µM, and typically at 10 µM. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 5:27 pm by Antoinette F. Konski
Internal citations omitted.1  10-K Statements Are Prior Art As articulated by the Federal Circuit, the Board here succumbed to the dangers of hindsight in conducting its obviousness analysis. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Moreover, referring to G 2/98 (OJ EPO 2001, 413, Reasons, points 4, 6.6 and 6.7), the opposition division concluded that the "intermediate generalisation in granted claim 1 with respect to the disclosure of priority document D16 does not give rise to the claiming of a limited number of clearly defined alternative subject-matters" and thus that the "subject—matter of claim 1 was only entitled to the filing date". [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
To qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet only one (1) of the following four (4) criteria: 1. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 3:35 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
If all prior awards include body parts and systems that are labeled in the Labor Code § 4664(c)(1)(G) category ( i.e., miscellaneous), then applicant would only be entitled to a 10% award of PD for the bulk of his CT related disability. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, G 2/10 points out that G 1/03 refers exclusively to undisclosed disclaimers (see G 2/10 [3.9]). [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:53 am by Jourdan Day
The anti-retaliation regulations were originally scheduled to take effect Aug. 10, 2016 and later pushed back to Nov. 1, 2016. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by V.Venkatesan
It is not necessary to go into the question whether DSPE is a valid piece of legislation. 10. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 2:09 am by Sander van Rijnswou
 Illustration is figure 1 in the contested patent EP 1 850 151 B1. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
Shortly after Doe's deposition, the Indiana plaintiffs settled their claims for approximately $260,000, about 10% of the value attorneys for the plaintiffs had put on them.Thereafter the Government empaneled a grand jury to investigate Doe and his business associate. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:20 am by John Jenkins
Does the filing date count as the first business day for the purposes of the Rule 10b5-1(c)(1)(ii)(B)(1) required cooling-off period? [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
Does 110, No. 10–5022, 2011 WL 5444622 (U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:08 am
Significantly, if a private inspector finds code violations, the ordinance does not require the inspector to turn his or her findings over to the city. [read post]