Search for: "He v. Holder"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 5,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 4:47 am
Puleo v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:00 am
The Court articulated its nominative fair use test this way: In cases where a nominative fair use defense is raised, we ask whether (1) the product was "readily identifiable" without use of the mark; (2) defendant used more of the mark than necessary; or (3) defendant falsely suggested he was sponsored or endorsed by the trademark holder. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
Holder and Hardy v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am
Holder, the challenge to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Here the CFI is giving judgment in an appeal arising from the Board of Appeal's refusal to uphold an opposition to a Community trade mark application brought by the holder of a national word mark RESPICORT for goods in Class 5 RESPICUR for goods in the same class.Case T-353/04 Ontex v OHIM, Curon Medical (CURON). [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
Unfortunately for all involved this muppet had already got a patent for the product 10 years previous when he worked for a different firm, the IPO have confirmed that the Rapstrap "falls within the scope of claims 1 and 5 of the patent," what action is taken remains to be seen.The ever reliable IPKat features two cases that caught IP Freely's eye: the Google France v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:45 am
Rivard v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:59 pm
(See U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 2:22 pm
USAWarshak v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
He then filed a motion forpostconviction relief, followed by an amended Rule 3.850 motion. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:46 am
Although Alice Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:17 pm
National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2004-1 v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 11:20 am
Holder, No. 09–21253–CIV, 2011 WL 649355, *6 (S.D. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Godoy guaranteed the promissory note.GDG defaulted on the note, and Wells Fargo — Wachovia's successor by merger and holder of the note — foreclosed on the real property securing the note on November 1, 2011. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Godoy guaranteed the promissory note.GDG defaulted on the note, and Wells Fargo — Wachovia's successor by merger and holder of the note — foreclosed on the real property securing the note on November 1, 2011. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Holder. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 8:11 am
Norwegian goes on to cite the decision in Armor Screen Corp. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:49 pm
He is, surely, the biggest gift that keeps on giving to their profession. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 5:28 pm
Simpson v. [read post]
