Search for: "Lowe v. State" Results 2901 - 2920 of 9,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm by Jessica Smith
Some of the activity appears to be covered by existing state statutory crimes. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:48 am by Michael Rubin
App. 2011), the low amount at stake for each individual employee (as in many wage-and-hour claims like Sutherland v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 7:18 am by Dennis Crouch
But thus far, the major constitutional challenge to the Act in Oil States Energy Servs v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:17 am
Low quality construction work with little soundproofing. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 2:10 pm by Record on Appeal
Judge Foley filed 1 concurring opinion here in State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Levinnstim v Parker, 27 AD3d 698; see also Molina v State of New York, 46 AD3d 642; Williams v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 10 AD3d 653). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:02 pm
Moreover, because of the low distinctiveness of the subsidiary word element 'colchon' in the earlier Spanish mark, consumers would focus their attention on the distinctive element, i.e. 'delta'.The Court stated that the mark applied for fell within the excessively simple category because it is made up of simple colours and geometric shapes. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 7:43 am by Tian Lu
However, its production costs are low, and profits are high, and there are hazards such as disrupting the market order and damaging the image of large brands, and this behaviour should be regulated. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
If our commercial speech doctrine doesn’t soon start recognizing this, the regulatory state will be in trouble. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:26 pm by David Smith
In August 2010 H held a landlord’s forum after which the same agent emailed H stating that the scheme was ‘seriously flawed’. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm by Peter J. Cavanaugh
  The case is The Garrison Company  v  Bishop International Airport Authority, Mich Ct App No. 293415 (Nov 18, 2010).In the case, the contractor submitted the low bid, its bid was accepted by the Airport Board, and the public body communicated this to the contractor. [read post]