Search for: "No. 337"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 4,432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2007, 1:40 pm
Id. at 336-337. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:16 am
In an ITC Section 337 action begun by patentee Tessera against Motorola, Freescale, Quallcom and others, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) granted a stay of its proceedings pending reexamination of the patent. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
Quashat, 364 F.3d 332, 337 (1st Cir. 2004). [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:55 am
Costa Crociere (09-337) – petitioner’s brief Hardt v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
For an accident that occurred in East Lansing, you should request the traffic crash report at the following location: East Lansing Police Department 409 Park Lane East Lansing, MI 48823 (517) 351-4220 Fax: (517) 337-7372 If your accident was investigated by the Michigan State Police, you need to request the report directly from that agency. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:29 am
Statewide only 337 citations have been issued to drivers who passed too closely--only 15 of those in Palm Beach County. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:00 pm
Trata-se de um Recurso de Revista com o arquivo AIRR.0068140-892009.5.11.0018, identificador 337-P-1, recebido no TST às 11h35. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 8:29 am
United Community Church, 231 Cal.App.3d at 337, 282 Cal.Rptr. at 376. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:48 pm
Rptr.3d 329, 337 (2010). [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 10:29 pm
., 337 F.3d 550, 556 (5th Cir.2003); Hodge v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 10:51 am
President Obama Signs S. 337 FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, June 30, 2016 The law: Codifies the Attorney General’s policy that agencies should release information unless “the agency reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by an exemption” or “disclosure is prohibited by law;” Requires that agencies alert requesters to the availability of agency FOIA Public Liaisons and OGIS to help resolve disputes at several points in the FOIA… [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:03 am
Garnering 337 online responses, it became the paper’s most commented upon story of the weekend. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:31 am
Instead, let's focus our resources on the patents that really matter (say those under threat of enforcement) in a speedy inter-partes reexamination/opposition system (perhaps with the USPTO as a party representing "the public interest," similar to Section 337 investigations before the ITC) where those with greatest commercial interest in the technology will be highly motivated to conduct a complete patentability search and present the best legal arguments. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 9:02 pm
See Courtney, 463 F.3d at 337. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
International Trade Commission should review a recent finding in a video game patent infringement case and clarify how to determine if a domestic industry is in the process of being established in Section 337 cases, the ITC's Office of Unfair Import Investigations said in a petition publicized Tuesday. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:58 am
Granted, $40 million to a company of Dell's size - revenues were $12.9 billion during the third quarter and earnings were $337 million - may not necessarily be material (hence the reason why the disclosure was quietly buried in the Q), but it's still a chunk of change. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:52 pm
Palm Beach Gardens, 635 F.2d 337, 341 (5th Cir. 1981) (holding that cause of action under the Hill-Burton Act was neither tort nor contract, and therefore the United States could pursue its cause of action at any time). [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:51 pm
The conclusion:Based on the foregoing, this court finds that the Commission provided a sufficient basis for finding no section 337 violation and its actions were not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 12:56 am
., 233 F.R.D. 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y.2005) (refusing to consider potential lead plaintiffs as a group); In re Veeco Instruments Inc. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 8:48 am
Additionally, we will be keeping our normal business hours and all calls to the office number, 217-337-1400, will be immediately answered and access to our attorney team and legal professionals will not be restricted in any way during the COVID-19 shelter in place measures. [read post]
