Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2901 - 2920
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 2:24 am
CopyrightThe Kluwer Copyright Blog reports on the decision of the Vienna Higher Regional State Court in case Puls 4 v YouTube, which found that a platform operator is not (as of yet) obliged to monitor the information it transmits or stores or to investigate circumstances which point to unlawful activity. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
The Board of Education and Roe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:29 pm
’” The case cite is Advertise.com, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:48 am
The state Supreme Court granted an appeal to determine whether § 552 imposes tort liability for economic losses to a contractor caused when a gas utility company fails to mark or improperly marks the location of gas lines. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Evans’s understanding of equality in United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
In Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Limited (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 Lord Keith stated that “the right to personal privacy is clearly one in which the law in this field should seek to protect. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
On Monday, November 1, 2010, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:46 pm
See Bellagio LLC et al v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 2:46 am
Marquez Brothers International, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
As an example of this alleged contributory infringement, Kimball cites Bradley Home Furnishings' website, which Kimball states features an unauthorized "Kimball Bedroom Collection" that originated from Defendant Coaster: Kimball indicates in the complaint that it first informed Defendant less than a month before this lawsuit was filed that it believed it held superior rights to the KIMBALL trademark but states that Coaster "continues its unlawful use of the… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Never too late 37 [week ending Sunday 15 March] - EPO v EPO’s staff | EPO’s Board of Appeal’s reform | Unitary Patent’s fees | Pinterest’s Community Trade Mark pinned down | Australian compulsory licences | Is COMFYBALLS trade mark offensive? [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:10 am
The state of the proceedings did not therefore permit final judgment to be given, so that Mega Brands’ application to dismiss the opposition in respect of the application to register its figurative mark had to be dismissed.Says the IPKat, this is another classic example of two trivial questions -- "will Spanish people who buy toys be confused between MAGNET 4 and the MAGNEXT word and figurative marks? [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:00 am
In Aztec Oil & Gas, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 8:56 am
You know that Supreme Court decision on preemption, Gobeille v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:14 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:02 am
Dukes and Comcast v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Research in Motion Limited v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 2:43 pm
Relying on Lahoti v. [read post]
