Search for: "Downs v State"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 40,832
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2023, 1:38 am
The whole multi-hour event was nothing but a thinly-veiled call from Brussels on the Luxembourg-based 15 judges of the Grand Chamber to reject the (actually well-reasoned and balanced) opinion AG Athanasios Rantos handed down in the European Superleague Company v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm
The Minister of State, Owen Ncube, had issued orders under the Interception of Communications Act (the Act) to shut down the internet in the country on public safety grounds during a period of social unrest. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
SARA WARD, Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:25 pm
Curtis Bradley and Jack Goldsmith examined the legal efficacy of the U.S. government prosecuting entities owned by foreign states, in the context of Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm
It’s way down there.Ready? [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Article V, because it requires two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states, is, as Sandy Levinson has put it, functionally dead. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:39 am
This concern resembles an issue currently before the Supreme Court – Axon Enterprises v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:20 am
Court documents filed in the Walters v State of Western Australia case detail substantial allegations of abuse and human rights violations against children held at the Banksia Hill Detention Centre. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 5:56 am
The Downing of Flight MH17 The third of the joined cases, The Netherlands v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:19 am
United States, 139 S.Ct. 2116, 2123 (U.S., 2019) (citing Mistretta v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:19 am
United States, 139 S.Ct. 2116, 2123 (U.S., 2019) (citing Mistretta v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
EPA, striking down Clean Power Plan. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am
In deciding this question, the Court had regard to the Grand Chamber’s judgment in Perinçek v Switzerland [2015] ECHR 907 [26]-[27], which stated that Article 17 only applies ‘on an exceptional basis and in extreme cases’ and, further, that the decisive point under Article 17 is whether ‘the applicant’s statements sought to stir up hatred or violence, and whether by making them he attempted to rely on the Convention to engage in an activity or… [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
According to Solum:[I]n Bradwell v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:29 am
” The brief asserts that the Supreme Court ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 6:21 pm
Anne Arundel County 2022). [2] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am
They also state that they expect the app’s users to follow the guidelines to receive the best possible results. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:35 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gonzalez v. [read post]
