Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 6,455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2023, 6:13 am
" Likewise, Rosenblatt v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
Ct. 2162, 2171 (2019); First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:42 am
The Court’s opinion in Wall v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 4:21 am
In May 2024, the English Supreme Court handed down judgment in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV.[1] The Supreme Court found that MUR Shipping BV (MUR) was entitled to rely on a force majeure clause to suspend its obligations under the contract of affreightment between the parties. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
In Xcentric Ventures LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
In Xcentric Ventures LLC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 12:13 pm
Subsequently, in its 2016 decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
That offer was contained in a letter which stated that: [W]e only have to offer you accommodation once. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The Role of the Jury in Criminal Trials Juries have played a central role in trials at least as far back as the Thirteenth Century, and were solidly part of the English system at the time of the founding of the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:05 pm
That separate case is Texas v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 pm
The case is entitled Dance, Inc. v NJDOL and issued from the New Jersey Appellate Division. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Just before the Christmas break, however, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:30 am
In plain English, the law means what it says. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:17 am
CRC Credit Fund Limited v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:27 pm
The New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG) represents the plaintiffs in the suit, Belovic v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:09 am
Since the Opinion itself is not available in English, we’re having to make do with the Press Release for the time being. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
