Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2016, 6:07 am
It’s not in standard English dictionaries, such as the American Heritage Dictionary, and I hadn’t seen it before, but it turns out to be fairly common in many states’ licensing proceedings. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
The case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 is a welcome reminder that the English Patents Court and Court of Appeal can, when required, deliver swift justice in a way that would be the envy of many IP Courts the world over. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
VMedia: The David and Goliath battle over the future of TV https://t.co/K4UEiDssBv -> Supreme Court Renders Landmark Privacy decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 2:56 am
In settling EEOC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
The English text of the Treaty cedes sovereignty to the Queen of England; guarantees Māori “the full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties which they may collectively or individually possess,” with the Crown having the exclusive right of preemption with respect to land purchases; and provides Māori with “all the Rights and Privileges of British Subjects. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
The judge held that the “undue burden” concept in English law (particularly as outlined by Arnold J in Eli Lilly v Janssen in 2014) was not particularly helpful under Australian law. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:49 am
The FLSA and its state counterparts cannot be so easily circumvented. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
Thankfully, for the thousands of European Patent Attorneys carrying out panic-stricken searches through files hastily-retrieved from the archive, it appears with retrospect that Edwards v Cook represents the high-water mark of the English Courts adopting a strict formulaic approach to priority entitlement. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:08 am
By Kelly McClure In Araujo v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
In last year, Sofa Works v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
In a two day hearing at the beginning of October, the Supreme Court heard the case of AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier & Ors focussing on the question of which EU member state has jurisdiction in international tortious claims. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
You are sitting in a café and discussing the US election with your French waiter (who speaks fluent English). [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
At first instance, Arnold J followed two first instance English Court decisions which suggest that the transfer of equitable title is sufficient (KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] and HTC v Gemalto [2013]). [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 6:33 am
State v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:30 am
Youn stated she was always enamored with both subjects. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union 2016 EWHC 2768 (Admin) see http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2016/2768.pdf A spokesperson from the Crown – or UK gov’t – or the Tory party, pick your poison, announced, as one might expect, that the decision will be appealed. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm
It’s a modified hold-over from English law, where the governing principle was simply “The king can do no wrong. [read post]
