Search for: "In re Johnson"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 6,169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2014, 6:59 am
” Johnson is right that random assignment is great for methodological validity. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 10:08 pm
You’re going to jail. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 9:37 pm
Johnson announced the sentence. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 5:28 pm
Marban wrote, “The commercial potential of (the earlier funded product) has been validated by a collaborative/option agreement between Capricor (the company I founded to develop regenerative therapeutics) and Janssen, an arm of the pharmaceutical giant Johnson and Johnson. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:00 pm
Congress has the responsibility to ask whether the DHS programs we’re spending so much on are consistent with our priorities as a nation. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
The Justice Department noted that the “prescription harvesting” scheme not only defrauded the health care systems, but also endangered public health by putting the old, re-used, and possibly adulterated or mis-branded medications back on the market. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 8:17 am
That’s the same schedule we’re on today. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Johnson & Johnson, 672 F. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:42 am
“Now we’re over $200 million less than that. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Over three years ago (an eon in blogging time) we urged our readers – particularly those of you who are in-house – to consider joining the Product Liability Advisory Council (“PLAC”). [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
Johnson & Johnson Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:43 pm
Johnson in North Richland Hills. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:13 am
In re Chantix (Varenicline) Prods. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/nSNhnbD6rs -> The MPAA Joins With CACP to Welcome Secretary Johnson. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:50 am
“If you are sending two people to Mars on a flyby they’re going to need to occupy their time. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am
In In re One Infant Child, 2014 WL 704037 (S.D.N.Y.) the District Court awarded the successful petitioner attorneys fees of $ 217,949.56, attorney's costs of $1,274.08, fact witness fees of $6,279.52, expert witness fees of $2,400, transcript fees of $1,465.20, lodging and travel fees of $20,451.88 and Investigative fees of $33,246.38 . [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Res. 36 (2005) 267-288. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia first recognized the standard of review in bankruptcy appeals: fact findings would be set aside if clearly erroneous, citing Bankruptcy Rule 8013, and legal issues, or mixed issues of law and fact, were decided de novo, citing In re: Johnson, Canal Corp v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm
” It could conceive of no circumstances when calling a subordinate that name would be acceptable (Johnson v STRIVE East Harlem Employment Group). [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
Julie Johnson v Daily Mail: This concerned an article in the Daily Mail with the same subject matter. [read post]
