Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 2921 - 2940 of 20,231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2019, 9:30 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act provides some of the strongest consumer protections in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
It was not because nationals other Member States may qualify for the Credit in question (Lord Hope, giving the main judgment, states in terms that “had a right to reside in the United Kingdom…been the sole condition of entitlement to state pension credit, it would without doubt have been directly discriminatory on grounds of nationality”: para 26); it was because not all UK nationals would be able to meet the test of habitual residence… [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:16 am by Rick Pildes
  With the emergence of the "responsible journalism" defense, UK/Canadian law now provides an alternative approach to defamation law that narrows the difference between the United States and these countries. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:10 am
On March 30, 2010 the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit issued a decision in the Peconic Baykeeper v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm
Brehm received another favorable trial judgment, this time against Unum Life Insurance Company – the largest group disability insurer in the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 3:20 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Not surprisingly, Judge Posner found that the United States, in proving its case, did not need to prove that Motorola lost money as a result of Jin's theft. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am by SHG
Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that the due process and equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibit ‘‘punishing a person for his poverty. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:48 am by Famighetti & Weinick
The right to freedom of speech is a core value guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm by William Birdthistle
  (The prospectuses of Janus mutual funds stated that market timing was prohibited; meanwhile, Janus allegedly accepted payments from hedge funds to market-time those funds and thus to siphon returns from long-term investors.) [read post]
  It is a question that has come before the United States Supreme Court on two prior occasions: When can a state require an out-of-state seller to collect and remit sales tax? [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:28 am by Katherine Cook
On December 31, 2020, the Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion, adopting the federal court’s summary judgment standard as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Anderson v. [read post]