Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 2921 - 2940
of 21,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm
Wyeth v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Luxembourg. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 11:43 am
The applications were accompanied by a description stating: “Colouring of vehicles in the colours red, white and orange, as shown”. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 6:08 am
Theatrical Stage Employees Union Local No. 2 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 1:23 am
While the Court acknowledged that the Board of Appeal does have a requirement to state their reasons for rejecting a mark, this was not omitted in the case at hand, as the reasons issued (namely on the banality of the sign with regard to the relevant goods or services) and their correlation with the classes was clearly given, even if regarding all of the classes of goods as a whole. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 1:34 pm
Athleta, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 6:00 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in Parallel Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
Akamai v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:02 pm
See Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:02 pm
See Sheetz of Delaware, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
Mark also came with us to Washington in 2008 to try to stop [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:05 am
" Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC and Bridgestone Corporation v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In a nutshell, the Court held that DOMA was invalid because it marked a stark deviation from a long history and tradition of the federal government’s deferring to state-law determinations of marital status. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
The chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
(Holt v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Though different in their details, these cases elucidate this issue from different perspectives:In January 2024, Rolex was successful in a US trade mark infringement case against BeckerTime before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 8:04 am
Group v Empire State Dev. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:21 pm
by Jeff Liu , MTTLR Associate EditorLast summer, a federal district court ruled, in Tiffany v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:42 am
Information Builders, Inc. v. [read post]