Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 2921 - 2940 of 4,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 8:21 pm by Ken
Note than many of them, as in San Bernardino, are small claims matters. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:28 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Master of the Ontario Superior Court noted that section 2(3) of ICAA states that, despite Article 1(3) (c) of the Model Code, an arbitration conducted in Ontario between parties having their place of business in Ontario is not international only because the parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the agreement relates to more than one country. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:16 pm by Tom Heintzman
The Master of the Ontario Superior Court noted that section 2(3) of ICAA states that, despite Article 1(3) (c) of the Model Code, an arbitration conducted in Ontario between parties having their place of business in Ontario is not international only because the parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the agreement relates to more than one country. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
On the subsequent pages of the notice of opposition, the indication of facts, evidence and arguments concern exclusively the subject-matter of claim 1. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 4:24 pm by Dennis Crouch
" Finally, if the subject matter disclosed and the claimed invention are owned by the same person (or subject to an obligation to assign to the same person), then the disclosure will not be considered 'prior art.' Current subsections (c), (d), and (g) no longer exist. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
By Thad Cox and James McEwen Ever since June 8, 2005, Representative Lamar Smith, then Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property, along with several co-sponsors, have attempted to change the U.S. patent system. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:53 am
The power and jurisdiction of the court to issue appropriate warrant against an accused on his failure to attend the court on the date of hearing of the matter cannot be disputed. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm by malik11397
AN ACT relating to real property; revising provisions governing the amount which a person holding a junior lien on real property may recover in a civil action under certain circumstances; prohibiting certain persons holding a junior lien on certain residential property from bringing a civil action under certain circumstances; revising provisions governing the amount of a deficiency judgment after the foreclosure of a mortgage or a deed of trust; limiting the amount – of certain judgments… [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:37 pm by The Legal Blog
Prabhat Mandal [1986 (1) SCC 100) thus: "an adjudication is conclusive and final not only as to the actual matter determined but as to every other matter which the parties might and ought to have litigated and have had decided as incidental to or essentially connected with subject matter of the litigation and every matter coming into the legitimate purview of the original action both in respect of the matters of claim and defence. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This intention is a recurrent theme in the travaux préparatoires for the EPC 1973, as is the intention that according to A 21(3)(c), the LBA should only deal with cases that concern only legal questions. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
” These passages, therefore, establish that the two conditions set out in headnotes 2.2 and 2.4 of G 1/03 have the same value. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 3:41 pm
(c) Means other than misrepresentation or other abusive debt collection practices are available for the effective collec¬tion of debts. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 12:14 pm by The Legal Blog
Clause (c) says that for "judicial settlement", the court shall refer the same to a suitable institution or person who shall be deemed to be a Lok Adalat. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Admissibility of the referral[1] In decision G 1/07 [4.2.3] the EBA pointed out that it was aware that, subsequent to decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 different opinions have been expressed in the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal on whether decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 relate to the disclaiming of embodiments which are disclosed as part of the invention in the application as filed or whether in that situation the jurisprudence as previously established… [read post]