Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 2921 - 2940 of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am by Matthew Flinn
R (on the application of Guardian News and Media Limited) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2010] EWHC 3376 – Read judgment The Guardian newspaper has failed to convince the High Court that it should be able to see  key documents in the trial of three men threatened with extradition to the United States on charges of corruption and bribery. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Compl. 47-48 227, ECF No. 197 (District refuses to warn about granting opposite sex access generally, or upon actual entry to a privacy facility.). [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:18 pm by Sasha Volokh
On Friday, I wrote about an amicus brief, for me and 54 other antitrust and competition policy scholars, that I wrote in Teladoc v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am by Eric Turkewitz
Katz to state on the record he would no longer practice ”medical-legal” examinations, repeatedly berated Dr, Katz, stating that “his career was over,” and even stated that defendants’ counsel wanted to “tear [Dr. [read post]
”  (para. 134) The Schrems II judgment will require many EU data controllers to reassess, and in some cases adapt, the mechanisms they use to transfer data internationally, not just to the United States but potentially to other foreign countries as well. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 5:31 am by Legal Beagle
  The Clyde & Co website states their Edinburgh office has over 50 lawyers and fee earners across the core sectors of insurance, professional liability, healthcare, employment and property. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In Improver, Hoffman J. stated that the second Catnic question (the third Improver question) the question that raised the question of construction (as compared to the factual background against which the claim is to be construed) [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:01 am
Separate Property       Section 770 states:   "Separate property of a married person includes all of the following:   [ Â] (1) All property owned by the person before marriage. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
  That case took place before SPCs when post-term injunctions could compensate an innovator patentee for regulatory delay (see paras 27 and 28). [read post]