Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 2921 - 2940 of 6,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2015, 1:26 am by Marta Requejo
Burkhard Hess, Director of the MPI Luxembourg, has very kindly accepted to have his view on two recent AG’s opinions published in CoL. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:55 am by Paul E. Freehling
,  808 A.2d 912, 922 (Pa. 2002) — which involved a sale of the assignor’s assets and held that the assignee could not enforce the covenant — was analogous. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am by Schachtman
Section 301(c)(2) of the Pennsylvania’s Workman’s Compensation Act, 77 P.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
It is often said on Wall Street that “one buys on the rumour and sells on the fact”, but the sale of the GoPro shares was as much about rumour and speculation as fact, observes Neil. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Copyright Office filing deadline & benefits of filing promptly V. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm by nedaj
 State-registered advisers need to examine their state’s rules to determine who constitutes the “client”. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
 Never too late 24 [week ending Sunday 14 December] -- ** INTA’s When Trademarks Overlap With Other IP Rights Special ** | Scottish Law Society misinforms about UPC in Scotland | EPO Enlarged BoA Members’ letter against against President Battistelli’s BoA Member’s house ban | German lititgator writes German delegate to EPO AC | EU Judges join the chorus of condemnation against President Battistelli | EPO replies to multilarelal… [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 7:44 pm by Francis Pileggi
  The court quoted the Supreme Court opinion in C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
Further, according to the court “goods coming from a non – member State which are…copies of goods protected in the European Union by copyright…can be classified as… ‘pirated goods’ where it is proven that they are intended to be put on sale in the European Union, such proof being provided, inter alia, where it turns out that the goods have been sold to a customer in the European Union or offered for sale or advertised to consumers in the… [read post]