Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 2921 - 2940
of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2010, 6:14 am
United States, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir.1982). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Company – Chevron v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:46 pm
The February 23, 2011 Court of Appeals opinion in Reiss v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 6:57 am
Therefore, the district court had properly denied the state judge’s motion to dismiss (Anderson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 11:32 am
Bremerton School District, 21-418. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Bartlett, the court ruled that a plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim failed because police officers had probable cause to arrest him. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
They never contemplated federal courts requiring states to switch from first-past-the-post, single-member districts to some other electoral system. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 7:05 pm
In Roman Catholic Diocese v. [read post]
20 Mar 2021, 4:36 am
The United States District Court in Hawaii recently addressed a clear example of the latter situation in a decision from Masuda-Cleveland v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
The rule is currently subject to a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the court has severed issues relating to the methodology supporting the revisions of section 112 of the CAA for expedited review (No. 12-1272). [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 10:41 pm
The rule is currently subject to a petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the court has severed issues relating to the methodology supporting the revisions of section 112 of the CAA for expedited review (No. 12-1272). [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
But as Judge Callahan points out, "[w]hile the Court found that heightened judicial scrutiny of the law was required, the Court did not actually apply heightened scrutiny. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:49 am
Like the Rhode Island trial court in Callaghan v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm
In June 2015, the Oslo District Court granted PST’s petition to maintain the seizure of the recording of a documentary on Islamist extremism, a documentary that particularly reported on the recruitment of foreign fighters by the Islamic State (IS). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:02 am
I was thinking about what this really means in the context of our cases in state and federal court in Idaho. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:53 am
Tafas v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court made clear in Brown v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 7:10 pm
” State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 9:00 pm
Unfortunately, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed Ms. [read post]
