Search for: "State v. House" Results 2921 - 2940 of 28,802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
Employees in California may bring claims of discrimination and retaliation pursuant to the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:21 am by becassidy
This comes on the heels of the case decided by the Court in May of this year: United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am by Neil H. Buchanan
These questions are motivated, of course, by the right-wing freakout regarding the search by federal agents of Donald Trump's house to look for documents that he had illegally taken with him from the White House. [read post]
Trump was scheduled for a deposition on August 10 in the civil case People of the State of New York v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Ilya Somin
OSHA reaffirmed important constraints on the executive's power to decide a "major question" of policy on its own, while also giving an indirect boost to constitutional nondelegation constraints on the transfer of legislative power to the White House and the administrative state. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm by Pete Strom
In part, this was due to the Feres Doctrine (Feres v. the United States, 340 U.S. 135), which prohibits individuals from filing a lawsuit or lawsuit based on injuries during their service. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:02 am by Jeremy Meisinger
” While both the CPPA and Newsom phrased their opposition in terms of consumer protection, it is hard to consider the fraught state/federal privacy dynamic without also considering the privacy chaos unleashed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]