Search for: "State v. P. B."
Results 2921 - 2940
of 6,784
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2015, 5:14 am
Next up: V is for Veterans’ Benefits Under the Tax Code, income is reportable and taxable unless otherwise excluded. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
Cf., State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:26 am
Strauss, 1 A D 2d 604, 607, motion for leave to appeal dismissed 2 N Y 2d 721; B. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:59 am
Oxman & Vincent P. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
App. 542, 411 S.E.2d 718 (1991), Tompkins State Bank v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:54 pm
P. 9(b)’s requirement to plead fraud “with particularity”). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:39 am
At the stage of final development of a product developed via the utilisation of genetic resources or traditional knowledge associated with such resources, users shall declare to the competent authorities referred to in Article 6(1) that they have fulfilled the obligations under Article 4 and shall simultaneously submit:(a) the relevant information from the internationally-recognised certificate of compliance; or(b) the related information as referred to in Article… [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:57 am
See State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:18 am
P 9(b). [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:18 am
P 9(b). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 6:05 am
By Joy P. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:56 am
Code § 160(b); see also DelCostello v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Disease Burden from Viral Hepatitis A, B, and C in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Afana, 169 Wash.2d 169, 233 P.3d 879 (Washington Supreme Court 2010)).State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
The following are excluded from expungement in DC: (9) "Ineligible misdemeanor" means: (A) Interpersonal violence as defined in § 16‑1001(6)(B), intimate partner violence as defined in § 16‑1001(7), and intrafamily violence as defined in § 16‑1001(9). [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 2:39 am
A large part of the new provisions concern duties of cooperation in case of insolvency of groups of companies (Chapter V). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm
Steele, Alexander B. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
Grant, 108 P.3d 768 (Washington Supreme Court 2005). [read post]
