Search for: "State v. Record" Results 2921 - 2940 of 44,297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2008, 4:18 pm
The criminal justice system in Guam doesn't come out smelling like a rose here.From a dubious initial traffic stop to two years of delay to having to turn over charges in an utterly routine prosecution to the United States to an entirely deficient record, what transpired here hardly screams "excessive competence. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 12:52 pm by Daily Record Staff
At the conclusion of the criminal investigation, the Office of the State’s ... [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am by Bradley R. Hall, E.D. Mich.
 It follows that the record under review is limited to the record in existence at that same time -- i.e., the record before the state court. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., Appellant, v New York State Office of Court Administration, Respondent, 2024 NY Slip Op 01523, addressing an agency's partial denial of a request for records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law   "Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lisa S. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., Appellant, v New York State Office of Court Administration, Respondent, 2024 NY Slip Op 01523, addressing an agency's partial denial of a request for records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law   "Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lisa S. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
United States (2015), the Supreme Court held that the fish was not a "record. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
United States (2015), the Supreme Court held that the fish was not a "record. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
United States (2015), the Supreme Court held that the fish was not a "record. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Karlin v McMahon, 96 NY2d 842, and Public Officers Law §87[2], the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's ruling, noting that "All government records are presumptively open for public inspection unless specifically exempt from disclosure" by state or federal statute. [read post]