Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 2:32 pm
In Brittania-U Nigeria, Ltd. v. [read post]
Case o' The Week: Bad Cops Make Good Law, Quon -- Fourth Amendment Privacy Interests in Text Content
22 Jun 2008, 3:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm
Alliance, with claimsfound obvious:Following a trial for patent infringement that resulted in a hung jury, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled as a matter of law that U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:13 am
California, which has its own, more rigorous wage-hour laws, has a large number of wage-hour cases filed in its state court system. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
Levi Strauss registered the Arcuate design with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1943. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:06 am
“All parties to a workers’ compensation proceeding retain the fundamental right to due process and a fair hearing under both the California and United States Constitutions. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 1:26 pm
With respect to the second issue on the size of the punitive damages award, the Court reiterated the standards articulated by the United States Supreme Court in State Farm v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
That would make the case for an anti-suit injunction or a stay much weaker, and the District Court for the Central District of California in TCL v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:46 am
In BRENDLIN v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
Here is the petition in White v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:38 pm
* * * Most states, like California, require that legislative apportionment be based on population. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:30 am
(argued April 16, 2018): U.S. laws generally apply only to conduct that happens in the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:41 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:10 pm
However, "[b]ecause Defendant PRC's wrongful acts alleged herein arise in connection with a commercial activity that causes a direct effect in the United Stated, Defendant PRC comes within an express exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, viz, 28 U.S.C. section 1605 (a)(2):(a) A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case - (1) in which the foreign… [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:12 am
United States (Tobacco; Federal Taxation)Mitchell, et al. v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:59 pm
In California v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
