Search for: "Does 1-41"
Results 2941 - 2960
of 4,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Requester compared claim 1 and claims 40 and 41, and showed that claims 40 and 41 simply incorporated additional limitations to claim 1, and thus were narrower than claim 1. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 4:15 am
JUROCK, 2013 BCCA 4 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
Does anyone know? [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:09 pm
Justice Donald wrote at paragraph 41:[41] Granting an automatic exemption to recipients of employment or disability insurance suggests a more generous approach than was previously taken. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
815 ILCS 505/1(c). [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm
SOCAN, which held that the internet delivery of a permanent copy of a video game containing musical works is not a “communication” under s. 3(1)(f) of the Copyright Act.The “communication” right was precisely the basis for the ringtone tariff in the first place. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 4:37 am
It was in 2004 when he committed the errors at issue, the fact he subsequently became certified does not help the government. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 2:49 pm
Maharishi challenged the Board of Appeal’s decision with four pleas, respectively concerning Article 7(1)(a) and 75, 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(3) of the CTM Regulation. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:57 am
(#41) “Was there damage to the vehicle [the accident victim was] occupying or struck by? [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
The language of FCA § 413(1)(c)(7) does not command any formula with respect to apportionment of private school tuition (to the same effect, see D.R.L. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45–46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957).Arters, 2013 WL 308768, at *1.Umm…. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 2:49 pm
(“objects being conveyed are subject to being caught in the gaps between the links”), solved by Habasit using an identical solution, see col. 14, lines 38-41 of Thompson, Jr. et al. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The European Court refers to “une marge d’appréciation particulièrement importante” ([41]). [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
No. 41 (Ont. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
Back on 1 April 1996, when the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market still smelled of new paint and no-one yet realised how few business flights landed at Alicante, Anheuser-Busch applied to register four Community trade marks (CTMs). [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 3:42 am
The company does not anticipate any significant financial impact as a result of this action. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 7:29 pm
Articles 1-10 focus on general principles and provisions. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Cir. 2004).AndThe decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11-20,36, 39-41, and 43-48 is AFFIRMED.This decision contains several new grounds of rejection pursuant to 37C.F.R. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:18 am
RFC CDO 2006-1 Ltd., Case No. 4:11-cv-664, Doc. [read post]
